Fish Post-Grant Radio: A series of podcasts dedicated to the discussion of developments in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and related practice tips.
Our host, Stuart Nelson, an attorney in our Twin Cities office, talks with practitioners and thought leaders across the country to discuss a wide range of post-grant topics. Be sure to visit fishpostgrant.com to listen to all of our past episodes and to subscribe to this podcast! To listen on-the-go, please download our app. You can also follow us on Twitter @fishpostgrant or subscribe by choosing one of the methods below.
This episode of Fish Post-Grant Radio features Erika Arner, who was appointed as president of the PTAB Bar Association earlier this year. In it, we learn more about the office of the president and what Erika has planned for the future of the PTAB Bar Association.
This episode of Fish Post-Grant Radio features Frank Porcelli and Dan Smith – attorneys at Fish & Richardson. In this interview, they discuss the Supreme Court’s decisions relating to Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group and SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu.
Fish Post-Grant Radio’s 8th episode features host Stuart Nelson and Christopher Hoff, a Fish & Richardson attorney in Minneapolis, discussing the latest precedential and informative IPR decisions regarding follow-on petitions, including General Plastics.
This episode of Fish Post-Grant Radio features Pedram Sameni, CEO of Patexia. In this interview, host Stuart Nelson and Pedram Sameni discuss features Patexia provides to practitioners interested in IPR and other post-grant proceedings, trends from Patexia’s PTAB search database, how people are using Patexia’s Connect, and more.
This episode of Fish Post-Grant Radio features Fish Principals John Dragseth and Rob Courtney. In this interview, they take a closer look at the Oil States v. Greene’s Energy Group case that was recently granted certiorari by the Supreme Court of the United States and whether inter partes review proceedings are constitutional. They also discussed what post-grant practitioners should consider between now and when the decision comes down.