Fish & Richardson - News and Events
1160
page,page-id-1160,page-template-default,logged-in,admin-bar,no-customize-support,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,select-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,select-theme-ver-3.5.2,menu-animation-underline,smooth_scroll,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-4.11.2.1,vc_responsive

News & Events

News

January 15, 2019

Law360 Names Fish Intellectual Property Practice Group of the Year

Fish has been named a 2018 “Practice Group of the Year” in Intellectual Property by Law360, marking the sixth year that the publication has honored Fish as the best of the best in IP practice.

January 3, 2019

Fish Post-Grant Attorneys Tasha Francis and Daniel Gopenko Named “Rising Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property

Traditionally, MIP‘s existing IP Stars guide featured only senior IP practitioners. However, based on feedback, the publication will now begin featuring attorneys who typically have fewer than 10 years of post-qualification experience, but who contribute a great deal to the success of their firms and clients.

January 3, 2019

Post-Grant Practice Co-Chair Karl Renner Quoted in Law360 Article “What To Expect After Year Of Change At The PTAB”

2018 was a tumultuous year for post-grant practice. In a recent article highlighting some of the biggest developments over the previous year, Fish Principal and Post-Grant Practice Co-Chair Karl Renner was asked for his perspective on the PTAB’s proposed revisions to the claims amendment process.

November 7, 2018

Fish Named Most Active Firm at the PTAB for First Nine Months of 2018 by Managing Intellectual Property

Fish & Richardson filed a total of 96 petitions on behalf of petitioners and 43 on behalf of patent owners over the first nine months of 2018.

October 31, 2018

Supreme Court Grants Return Mail’s Petition for Certiorari in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv.

The Supreme Court has granted, in part, Return Mail’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari requesting review of the Federal Circuit’s affirmance of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision finding the challenged claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,826,548 (“’548 patent”) patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Fill out the form below to receive our monthly newsletter and updates on your selected areas of interest. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the email.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.