Fish successfully defended client Bose against several IPR petitions filed by its competitor Freebit while simultaneously advancing IPR petitions of our own against Freebit's patents, which resulted in all challenged…
View Case Study
Fish and Richardson has obtained the first appellate reversal of a Post-Grant Review (PGR) proceeding at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit since the proceedings were…
View Case Study
Fish filed petitions for Covered Business Method (CBM) Review at the PTAB involving patents at the center of a lawsuit filed by Smartflash, LLC, a patent holding company. Smartflash had…
View Case Study
On June 9, 2017, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruled in favor of Fish client Coherus BioScience’s petitions for Inter Partes Review (IPR) of AbbVie’s U.S. Patent 9,073,987 (‘987…
View Case Study
In January 2015, Leapfrog Product Development, LLC, filed an inter partes review petition against Lifefactory, Inc., challenging the patentability of the latter’s claims directed to protective silicone sleeves for glass…
View Case Study
Fish won a precedent-setting victory for client Cutsforth, Inc., when the Federal Circuit reversed two Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings that had erroneously declared Cutsforth's claims unpatentable. The Federal Circuit's opinion…
View Case Study
With a record of more than 20 years of innovation and technology leadership in the fabless semiconductor industry, Lantiq needed to ensure a positive result in defending its patent when…
View Case Study
In an uncommon move, InComm’s competitor separately filed inter partes and ex parte reexaminations of the same patent. Equally uncommon was the use of a patent owner’s statement in the…
View Case Study
Following a groundbreaking demonstration in 2006, Perceptive Pixel quickly became an industry leader in multi-touch display technology. In 2008, Perceptive Pixel’s Multi-Touch “Magic Wall” was at the forefront of the…
View Case Study