Resources

April 26, 2018

Looking Ahead: Practical Implications of Oil States Energy Services and SAS Institute

On April 24th, the Supreme Court of the United States released two much anticipated opinions relating to Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC and SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu. In this webinar, Fish principals Dorothy WhelanKarl Renner, John Dragseth, and Rob Courtney reviewed the opinions and discussed practical implications for each:

Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC

  • Does the Supreme Court’s blessing of IPR proceedings portend anything for the future of the USPTO?
  • Is this holding just “business as usual” or can unusual results be pulled out of the opinion?
  • What are the biggest remaining administrative law issues?

SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu

  • The Supreme Court says the PTAB must consider all challenged claims when instituting an IPR.
  • What does this mean for already-filed IPR proceedings?
  • How does this holding affect institution strategies for Petitioners and Patent Owners (if it affects them at all)?
  • Can the PTAB work around this decision?
  • What does the close 5-4 decision tell us about future PTO appeals?

Speakers:
Dorothy Whelan, Principal & Post-Grant Practice Co-Chair
Karl Renner, Principal & Post-Grant Practice Co-Chair
John Dragseth, Senior Principal
Rob Courtney, Principal
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Fill out the form below to receive our monthly newsletter and updates on your selected areas of interest. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link at the bottom of the email.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.